On August 18, 2023, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, in deciding the case Hamilton, et al. v. Dallas County, overruled a nearly 30-year-old line of precedent that limited actionable employment actions under Title VII to “ultimate employment decisions related to hiring, granting leave, discharges or compensation.” The Fifth Circuit has jurisdiction over claims in Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas.
New Standard:
A Fifth Circuit plaintiff now only needs to plead discrimination in hiring, firing, compensation, or the terms, conditions, or privileges of their employment; Proving an “ultimate employment decision” is no longer necessary.
What this means for employers:
The removal of any pleading requirement makes it easier for aggrieved employees to bring discrimination claims. Fifth Circuit employers, or employers with employees based in Louisiana, Mississippi, or Texas, may notice that more employees will be empowered to bring smaller discrimination claims once they learn that they no longer have to show an “ultimate employment decision.” Employers may also notice that discrimination claims are proceeding further into the litigation process, as it will now be more difficult for defendants to resolve these claims by pre-trial motions.
Many circuits have implemented tests regarding the minimal amount of harm necessary for a claim to be actionable under Title VII. Unfortunately, the Fifth Circuit has not. As the Court of Appeals left this question open, we will likely see decisions in the near future attempting to define the scope and nature of harm necessary for an actionable employment discrimination claim in the Fifth Circuit. Because there is not currently a minimum-harm threshold, impacted employers should prepare themselves for a significant increase in discrimination claims alleging seemingly minor differences in “terms, conditions, or privileges” of employment.
The attorneys at Thompson Coburn LLP keep a keen eye on all statutory and judicial developments across the United States. For questions related to this decision or any other work-related inquiries, do not hesitate to reach out to your Thompson Coburn attorney.
NOTICE.
Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that
doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited
information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information
about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from
us that we represent you (an ‘engagement letter’).
By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and, further, even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you. Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.