Thompson Coburn associate Matt Nevola wrote a recent article in the American Bar Association’s Litigation Section on the issue of hearsay admissibility, the role of cross-examination, and the importance of trial preparation. Matt emphasized that a “witness’s presence on the stand under oath does not guarantee the admissibility of the witness’s prior out-of-court statements.”
He wrote, “Generally, federal and corollary state evidentiary rules require out-of-court statements, offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted, to fall within either an exclusion from the hearsay definition or an exception to the hearsay rule.” Matt explained that unless an out-of-court statement fits into a specific exception, it is typically inadmissible.
Click here to read the full article (subscription required).
NOTICE.
Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that
doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited
information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information
about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from
us that we represent you (an ‘engagement letter’).
By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and, further, even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you. Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.