Hofstra University School of Law,
J.D., 1981
Connecticut College,
B.A., Biology, cum laude, 1978
District of Columbia
New York
American Public Transportation Association
Past Chair, Legal Affairs Committee
Member of Legislative Committee
Member of Policy and Planning Committee and Zero Emission Fleet Committee
Member of Capital Investment Grants Working Group
Member of WTS – DC Chapter
Rated AV Preeminent® in Legal Ability & Ethical Standards in The American Registry, 2020 -2024, managed and monitored by Martindale Hubbell
Listed among Top Rated Lawyers in Labor and Employment in 2019 by ALM Legal Leaders
Thompson Coburn LLP
Partner, 2001-Present
Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott
Partner, 1991-2001
United States House of Representatives Energy & Commerce Committee
Counsel, 1981-1987
Jane serves as counsel to transit agencies across the country on a range of issues including funding, project development, and procurement. She is co-chair of the Firm's national Public Transit practice.
An advisor to several transit authorities around the country, Jane counsels clients on procurement issues, such as contracting for transit operating and maintenance services, and the purchase of vehicles (including innovative technologies) and equipment, compliance with requirements of the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), including Buy America, and the development of and funding associated with capital investment projects, including bus rapid transit (BRT) projects. Jane's work also includes labor protection issues under section 13(c) of the Federal Transit Act; including claims, certification disputes before the Department of Labor and in arbitration, and labor issues associated with the contracting of transit services.
Finding available funding opportunities is key to the success of the Nation's mass transit systems. Having served as Counsel to the Committee on Energy and Commerce in the U.S. House of Representatives, Jane understands the congressional authorization and appropriations process and works with clients to develop effective approaches for funding and statutory changes. Jane's Hill experience enables her to effectively formulate and advocate positions on legislation, develop advocacy documents and legislative language, analyze legislation and advise clients on the legislative process as well as the implementation of enacted legislation by the Executive Branch. Jane closely monitored Congress' recent passage of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act and is tracking the implementation of this new infrastructure legislation by FTA and DOT, and associated legislative appropriations measures.
Jane has helped transit agencies ensure compliance with Federal statutes and regulations, and navigate the FTA process and the programmatic requirements with which capital investment projects and contracting solicitations must comply.
In addition, Jane and members of the Firm's litigation group have successfully represented transit clients in environmental litigation, arbitration, and challenges to contracting actions and state legislation.
The changing landscape of domestic preferences for federal infrastructure projects under BABA
“Transit Labor Protection – A Guide to Section 13(c) of the Federal Transit Act”;
Co-author, Transportation Research Board, June 1995
“The Competitive Access Debate: A ‘Backdoor’ Approach to Rate Regulation”;
Co-author, Transportation Law Journal, Vol. XVI, No. 2, 1988
“Aftershocks of the Loss of the Legislative Veto: Severability and the Need for a Replacement Device”;
Co-author, Pace Law Review, Vol. 7, No. 3-4, 1987
NOTICE.
Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that
doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited
information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information
about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from
us that we represent you (an ‘engagement letter’).
By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and, further, even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you. Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.