Valparaiso University School of Law,
J.D., Magna Cum Laude, 1995
University of Illinois,
A.B., 1992
Illinois
Indiana
US Supreme Ct
US Ct Appeals, 2nd Circuit (CT, NY, VT)
US Ct Appeals, 3rd Circuit (DE, NJ, PA, Virgin Islands)
US Ct Appeals, 5th Circuit (LA, MS, TX)
US Ct Appeals, 6th Circuit (KY, MI, OH, TN)
US Ct Appeals, 7th Circuit (IL, IN, WI)
US Ct Appeals, 8th Circuit (AR, IA, MN, MO, NE, ND, SD)
Illinois USDC, Northern District
Illinois USDC, Central District
Indiana USDC, Northern District
Illinois USDC, Southern District
Michigan USDC, Western District
Wisconsin USDC, Eastern District
Wisconsin USDC, Western District
ESOP Association
Legislative & Regulatory Advisory Committee, 2018-2024
American Bar Association
speaker at ABA ERISA Litigation conferences, 2005-2017
Chicago Bar Association
speaker at annual ERISA review
Legal 500, Labor and Employment: ERISA Litigation, 2014, 2018
Best Lawyers in America, Employee Benefits (ERISA) Law (2021-2025)
Illinois Super Lawyers, ERISA/Employee Benefits, 2011-2013, 2016-2019
Throughout Michael Graham's career, his focus has been dedicated to handling employment, fiduciary, regulatory, employee benefits and ERISA litigation matters. He frequently advises plan administrators, fiduciaries and sponsors on compliance and disputes.
Michael is experienced in the litigation and transactional sides of employee benefits work and has served as first chair on numerous Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and employment cases, including fiduciary breach class actions and victories in the United States Courts of Appeal. He has litigated Title VII and multiemployer pension plan disputes, 401(k) plan class actions on administrative fees, and fiduciary and regulatory disputes, to name a few.
He advises on Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) reporting requirements and withdrawal liability. He also represents pension plans, including employee stock ownership plans (ESOPs), before the U.S. Department of Labor and Internal Revenue Service. He advises plan administrators and employers on proper compliance with ERISA claims and appeals procedures, helping them minimize liability exposure.
When litigation is necessary, Michael regularly handles fiduciary breach, fiduciary and valuation, pension calculation, investment and administrative fee and complex welfare cases in federal and state courts nationwide. His practice involves significant ESOP litigation defense of fiduciaries, trustees, plan sponsors and shareholders. Along with retirement class action work involving Section 401(k) and 403(b) plans, he also defends clients in a variety of multi-employer pension plan matters involving withdrawal liabilities.
Michael is a well-known speaker on ERISA and ESOP issues nationally. He is a member of The ESOP Association's Legislative & Regulatory Committee.
Previously, he worked at several major law firms in the labor and employment, employee benefits and ERISA litigation arena and clerked for the Honorable Allen Sharp, Chief Judge of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana. A native of Chicago's south suburbs, he was a first-generation college graduate and the first in his family to achieve a post-undergraduate degree.
Obtained release of all liability sought by an agency for an employer in an ERISA litigation suit and agency dispute. Potential damages were valued at $100 million.
Obtained issuance of a no suit letter for an employer in a Department of Labor ESOP and ERISA investigation. Potential damages were valued at $25 million.
Successfully represented various plan administrators in multimillion-dollar ERISA litigation lawsuits involving fiduciary breach, estoppel and prohibited transactions in federal court and before five circuits of the US Court of Appeals.
Defended ESOP trustees, selling shareholders and employers in class action lawsuits challenging valuation and transactional issues with hundreds of millions of dollars of potential liability.
Advised plan fiduciaries in fiduciary breach and prohibited transaction lawsuits challenging benefit plan compliance and plan investment decisions.
Advised and defended employers in multiemployer welfare and pension plan litigation, seeking to limit the liability sought by governmental agencies or pension funds, including cases seeking withdrawal liability by the Central States multiemployer pension fund.
Counseled clients in complex ERISA issues related to plan terminations and withdrawals from multiemployer plans and the termination of employer-sponsored plans.
Guided several large employers through the IRS' Voluntary Correction Program seeking to limit liability for plan administration failures.
Defended plan administrators and challenges to benefit claim determinations involving qualified and non-qualified plans.
Litigated several out-of-network health care provider lawsuits, defending self-funded medical plans in disputes involving benefit payment models and benefit decisions.
Defended plan sponsors in challenges related to reductions to retiree medical benefit plans.
Advised several large employers, including a significant ESOP-owned company, through a large administrative benefit claim review process involving hundreds of potential plaintiffs.
Challenge to PBGC Pension Bailout Liability Rules Denied by U.S. Bankruptcy Court
New Wave of ERISA Lawsuits Attack Self-Funded Health Care and Wellness Plans on Tobacco Surcharges
New ERISA Decision in 401(k) Forfeiture Suit Furthers Court Split
Federal Court Finds that ERISA Preempts Illinois Genetic Privacy Act Claim
Co-Author, "INSIGHT: PBMs Facing More Than ERISA Suits as RICO, Antitrust, State Law Claims Grow,"
Bloomberg Law November 18, 2019
Co-Author, "INSIGHT: Exclusive Benefit – An Analysis of PBMs as Potential ERISA Fiduciaries,"
Bloomberg Law October 4, 2019
Co-Author, "8 Best Practices for Handling ERISA Benefit Claims,"
Law360 September 27, 2019
Co-Author, “ERISA Benefit Claim Administration Best Practices,"
LexisNexis September 13, 2019
Co-Author, "Follow the Scripts – Trends in ERISA Litigation against PBMs,"
Bloomberg Law August 7, 2019
Speaker, “ERISA Appeals,”
ABA-CLE ERISA Litigation Conference May 18, 2019
NOTICE.
Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that
doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited
information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information
about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from
us that we represent you (an ‘engagement letter’).
By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and, further, even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you. Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.