Missouri State University,
Certification for Mediation Training for Civil Cases, 2016
University of Iowa College of Law,
J.D., 1991
Southern Methodist University,
B.A., Russian Studies, 1988
Illinois
Missouri
Illinois Supreme Ct
Missouri Supreme Ct
Illinois USDC, Southern District
Missouri USDC, Eastern District
Missouri USDC, Western District
US Ct Appeals, 7th Circuit (IL, IN, WI)
US Ct Appeals, 8th Circuit (AR, IA, MN, MO, NE, ND, SD)
DRI
Product Liability SLG, Vice Chair for Hand and Power Tools Section
ACI, Speaker, Women Leaders in Life Sciences Law
NITA - Trained Thompson Coburn associates skills for effective depositions
Listed in The Best Lawyers in America® (by BL Rankings), 2022-2025
Thompson Coburn LLP
Partner, 2019-Present
Fox Galvin, LLC
Of Counsel, 2001-2019
Armstrong Teasdale
Associate, 1997-2001
Barnes-Jewish hospital system
Risk Manager, 1995-1997
St. Louis Children’s Choir
Board Member, 2011-Present
New Commandment Ministries
Co-Founder and Board Member, 2004-Present
FEMA Certified Chaplain in disaster response counseling
2007-2017
Legal Advocates for Abused Women
Board Member, 1996-2004
Clients turn to Suzanne Galvin for results in complex high-profile litigation, particularly in the areas of pharmaceutical, medical device, and environmental exposure claims. Suzanne began her career working on one of the first MDLs regarding factor concentrate, and she has been involved in complex litigation and class action defense ever since.
Her career has developed through the years from handling research to working on deposition teams for national litigation to serving on national trial teams for products as varied as vaginal mesh implants, pharmaceuticals, and lithium ion batteries. In between, Suzanne has been involved in numerous MDLs, dozens of class actions, and hundreds of bet-the-company cases defending products as varied as gasoline additives, table saws, fire suppression systems, tobacco, and diabetes medication.
In one class action case, Suzanne led the deposition of the class representative. Immediately after the deposition, the entire case was dismissed. She is currently defending a uranium processing facility in Southern Illinois against claims it affected property values and allegedly caused medical issues in the community. Suzanne identified, retained, and prepared the medical experts in these cases. She and a team also took depositions of 14 treating physicians, all of which resulted in favorable testimony for the client.
Suzanne particularly enjoys identification, preparation, and presentation of expert witnesses. Her understanding of complex medical issues stems from her time as in-house counsel at one of the leading teaching hospitals in the U.S. Her extensive contacts in the medical field serve clients well, and her understanding of law and medicine allow her to make complex issues manageable for juries.
Suzanne is a leading attorney defending public water suppliers and other businesses against the increasing number of tort, environmental, and class action lawsuits related to PFAS, or "forever chemicals." As a thought leader in the field, Suzanne has spoken at national seminars and has been featured in industry publications, including Bloomberg Law, which details a revised multibillion-dollar PFAS settlement between 3M Co. and water utilities that limits future liability in a case involving specialized firefighting foam.
Suzanne has co-authored "A brief primer on PFAS litigation: Trends and future disputes," which has been cited in notable legal publications such as the Indiana Law Review.
Currently, Suzanne is representing a public water company in Connecticut facing allegations of PFAS contamination, while also advising businesses on managing litigation and regulatory risks associated with handling these compounds.
Suzanne feels practicing law is like tending a garden. With proper planning and preparation, it is possible to yield a great result, no matter how daunting the task may seem. And she is no stranger to danger: She and her husband, John, have served for years as crisis counselors in disaster response after natural disasters, terrorism, and political unrest. They've served in places including Lebanon, Iraq, Ukraine, and Kenya.
Representing a national retailer in opioid litigation proceedings.
Defeated class certification against automotive manufacturer.
Led affirmative discovery on environmental claims relating to a release from a gasoline pipeline; worked to marshal evidence related to exposure and medical causation for over 90 plaintiffs.
Primary responsibility for developing evidence and briefing opposition to a class certification motion related to horsepower labeling on power equipment, leading to a nominal settlement on class actions claims in St. Clair County, Illinois.
Serves on a national trial team for a pelvic mesh implant manufacturer.
Summary judgment for various products including fire suppression system manufacturer, motorcycle manufacturer, physicians, hospitals, tissue collection agency, pesticide manufacturer, and hip implant manufacturer.
A brief primer on PFAS litigation: Trends and future disputes
Are you ready for remote depositions? Adjusting to the new normal of litigation
Adding COVID-19 to the informed consent process: A Q&A for health care providers
Quoted, "3M’s Revised PFAS Settlement Includes Atypical Liability Terms"
Bloomberg Law, September 5, 2023
ACI Drug and Medical Device Litigation Conference
Suzanne Galvin Quoted in Bloomberg Law Regarding Revised PFAS Settlement
Suzanne Galvin joins Ukrainian Partnership Foundation Board
John and Suzanne Galvin’s journey to Ukraine: ‘If we train 30 people, they can help 3,000’
St. Louis litigators John Galvin, Suzanne Galvin join Thompson Coburn
NOTICE.
Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that
doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited
information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information
about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from
us that we represent you (an ‘engagement letter’).
By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and, further, even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you. Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.