Duke University School of Law,
J.D., 2013
Missouri University of Science and Technology,
B.S., Mechanical Engineering, 2010
Missouri
Texas
US Ct Appeals, 5th Circuit (LA, MS, TX)
Missouri USDC, Eastern District
US Patent and Trademark Office
Listed in "Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch" (by BL Rankings) in St. Louis, Missouri for Intellectual Property Law, Litigation - Intellectual Property, and Patent Law 2022-2025
Thompson Coburn LLP
Partner, 2022-Present
Associate, 2019-2021
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
Associate, 2013-2019
Nathan is committed to helping his clients protect some of their most valuable assets whether it be through intellectual property counseling or in litigation.
Nathan works with clients in developing comprehensive strategies for protecting their key intellectual property assets, including advising clients regarding preparing and prosecuting patent applications both domestically and internationally. He works with clients to develop and implement strategies to protect their innovations using both short-term and long-term tools to seek the best results for their business.
On the litigation side, Nathan has deep experience representing plaintiffs and defendants primarily in federal litigation and before arbitration and administrative bodies. He has experience in a wide range of IP disputes, including patent, copyright, trademark, and trade secret cases, representing large and small companies alike across a variety of industries and technologies, including telecommunications, biotechnology, consumer electronics, and sporting goods. He also steps up to help clients involved in other complex litigation matters, such as antitrust litigation or other business disputes.
Nathan earned his J.D. at Duke University School of Law, where he was Research Editor of the Duke Law Journal and an officer of the Intellectual Property and Cyberlaw Society.
The other side of IPR estoppel: When shotgun petitions backfire
NOTICE.
Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that
doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited
information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information
about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from
us that we represent you (an ‘engagement letter’).
By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and, further, even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you. Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.