Our post-grant proceedings attorneys handle all aspects of post-issuance proceedings before the USPTO, for both patent owners and challengers. Benefiting from the strength of our patent prosecutors and litigators, we strategically assist clients with post-grant proceedings created by the America Invents Act (AIA), including inter partes review (IPR) and post-grant review (PGR), as well as reissues, reexaminations, and supplemental examinations.
Our attorneys have decades of experience handing post-grant proceedings, including in front of the Patent Trial & Appeal Board (“Board”) and the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Our post-grant teams include attorneys both with litigation and patent-prosecution experience. Not only do we have the engineering and science backgrounds necessary to analyze complex inventions and prior art, but we have the litigation skills needed to effectively defend and depose expert witnesses, as well as the ability to persuasively present the case to the Administrative Patent Judges on the Board.
Our post-grant attorneys also work collaboratively with our patent litigators. Most often, a post-grant proceeding is but one battle in a larger patent war, likely involving patent litigation (sometimes in multiple jurisdictions) and perhaps other post-grant proceedings. We believe it is essential to keep the entire picture in mind, e.g., developing strategies that might result in stayed litigation or improved claim construction and non-infringement positions for patent challengers, or new patent claims that can be asserted against infringers for patent owners. Post-grant proceedings can also be extremely effective tools in driving settlement.
Patent Office clarifies standard for indefiniteness in AIA post-grant proceedings
IPR estoppel: A broad interpretation prevails
Supreme Court holds that with respect to institution decisions, no review means no review
USPTO: Extensions under the CARES Act during COVID-19
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s response to COVID-19
Supreme Court nixes USPTO’s practice of partially instituting IPR challenges
The Supreme Court upholds the constitutionality of the IPR process
Part III: Another update on IPR estoppel in the courts and at the PTAB
PTAB offers clarification on inter partes review and state sovereign immunity
Amending claims may be getting easier in post-grant proceedings, at least for now
An update on the shifting standard for IPR estoppel
The shifting standard for IPR estoppel: Where are we now?
Partner
|
St. Louis
|
Addressing the intellectual property needs of both large corporate clients and individuals, Thad works extensively on patent protection and other IP related issues for a ... Addressing the intellectual property needs of both large corporate clients ... |
|
|||||
Partner
|
St. Louis
|
Tony's practice encompasses a broad range of intellectual property matters, including patents, trade secrets, copyrights, trademarks and other issues involving the intern... Tony's practice encompasses a broad range of intellectual property matters,... |
|
|||||
Partner
|
St. Louis
|
Matt is vice chair of the Intellectual Property Practice Group. Matt is vice chair of the Intellectual Property Practice Group. |
|
|||||
Partner
|
St. Louis
|
Matt’s practice is focused on the preparation and prosecution of patent applications in a variety of mechanical and electrical arts. Matt’s practice is focused on the preparation and prosecution of patent app... |
|
|||||
Partner
|
St. Louis
|
David strategically advises clients in a variety of intellectual property disputes including patent prosecution, IP litigation, brand protection, counterfeiting, Post-Gra... David strategically advises clients in a variety of intellectual property d... |
|
|||||
Partner
|
Chicago
|
Clients look to Sartouk for counsel on how to advance their business goals through strategic and creative approaches to the protection and enforcement of their intellectu... Clients look to Sartouk for counsel on how to advance their business goals ... |
|
|||||
Partner
|
St. Louis
|
Alan represents clients in all aspects of intellectual property litigation, with a strong emphasis on patent litigation at both the trial and appellate court levels, and ... Alan represents clients in all aspects of intellectual property litigation,... |
|
|||||
Partner
|
Chicago
|
Michael counsels clients on patent and trademark issues and represents them in federal courts across the United States. Michael counsels clients on patent and trademark issues and represents them... |
|
|||||
Partner
|
St. Louis
|
Ben brings a background in electrical and computer engineering to his legal practice, which primarily focuses on the preparation and prosecution of patent applications. Ben brings a background in electrical and computer engineering to his legal... |
|
NOTICE.
Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that
doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited
information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information
about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from
us that we represent you (an ‘engagement letter’).
By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and, further, even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you. Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.