With the presidential election in November a little more than three months away, the presumptive nominees, former Vice President Joe Biden and President Donald Trump, are set to square off on a variety of policy issues. As it has for the past several months, the COVID-19 pandemic will likely dominate the upcoming contest, but Biden has proposed a variety of federal tax law changes in contrast to Trump’s Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (“TCJA”). This article provides a high-level discussion of the candidates’ tax law proposals, but it is important to note that these are initial proposals, additional details may arise and any changes in tax law are often ultimately driven by Congress.
Biden has heavily criticized the TCJA and called for higher taxes on both ordinary and capital gain income for high net worth individuals. Specifically, Biden has proposed the following tax law changes:
President Trump has not yet issued an official tax policy proposal for his reelection campaign, but the budget proposals that the White House has submitted to Congress since the passage of the TCJA have all assumed that the individual income provisions from the TCJA that are set to expire at the end of 2025 will be made permanent. Trump has proposed doubling-down on the TCJA and also proposed a so-called “Tax Reform 2.0” for low-income and middle-income taxpayers that is set to be unveiled in September.
The table below provides a comparison of some key policy issues among the current law, Trump’s proposal, and Biden’s proposal.
Policy issue | Current law | Donald Trump | Joe Biden |
---|---|---|---|
Ordinary income rate | Top marginal rate of 37% until 2026 | Make current law permanent; however, to the extent the current law expires, top marginal rate reverts to 39.6% beginning in 2026 | Restore top marginal rate to 39.6% for taxpayers with over $400,000 of taxable income |
Capital gains & dividends | 0% rate on capital gains and dividends for taxpayer’s with income between $0 and $40,000 15% rate on capital gains and dividends for taxpayer’s with income between $40,0001 and $441,450 20% rate on capital gains and dividends for taxpayer’s with income of $441,451 and above |
Make current law permanent; however, to the extent the current law expires, applicable capital gains rate will again be tied to a taxpayer’s ordinary income rate beginning in 2016 (e.g., 15% rate if a taxpayer’s ordinary marginal income tax rate is between 25%, and 35%) | Tax capital gains and dividends at 39.6% for taxpayers with over $1 million of taxable income |
Itemized deduction cap | Itemized deduction limit repealed until 2026 | Make current law permanent; however, to the extent the current law expires, the “Pease” limitation is reinstituted | Cap value of itemized deduction at 28% |
Corporate rate | Max corporate tax rate of 21% | No proposed change | Raise corporate rate to 28% |
Corporate amt for profit ≥ $100 million | No corporate AMT | No proposed change | Institute 15% corporate AMT |
GILTI rate | 10.5% rate | No proposed change | Double rate to 21% |
High-income social security payroll tax | No Social Security payroll tax on income above $137,000 | No proposed change | Institute 12.4% Social Security Payroll tax on income in excess of $400,000 |
Ed Buchholz is a member of Thompson Coburn’s Tax group. David J. Kaufman is a member of Thompson Coburn’s Corporate & Securities Practice group.
NOTICE.
Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that
doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited
information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information
about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from
us that we represent you (an ‘engagement letter’).
By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and, further, even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you. Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.