Tom Polcyn and Alex Weidner authored an article for World IP Review titled, "Will the Jack Daniel’s Case Cause “Lotso” Issues for Disney?," published July 13, 2023.
The article discusses the potential impact of the Supreme Court's recent ruling in the Jack Daniel's Properties, Inc. v. VIP Prod. LLC on the newly remanded Diece-Lisa v. Disney case, involving trademark infringement allegations related to the "Lots-o’-Huggin’ Bear" character from Toy Story 3. The Jack Daniel's decision narrowed the scope of the Rogers test, making it easier for trademark plaintiffs to pursue claims. However, the application of the Jack Daniel's decision to the Diece-Lisa v. Disney case remains uncertain, particularly concerning claims based on merchandise and media.
Polcyn and Weidner explore the implications of the ruling for future trademark litigation, striking a balance between First Amendment rights and the protection of trademarks. They noted, "The Jack Daniel’s decision has created greater uncertainty for parodists and creators of expressive works, who will now need to ask themselves if the use of another's trademark, or obvious variant thereof, is used "solely" in an expressive manner (for example, in parody or critical commentary about the trademark owner or its genre), or if it is really just being used to grab attention and sell products."
NOTICE.
Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that
doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited
information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information
about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from
us that we represent you (an ‘engagement letter’).
By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and, further, even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you. Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.