Thompson Coburn partners John Kingston and Sonette Magnus authored an article published by the American Bar Association on the complexities of attorney-client privilege, several common pitfalls, and advice on how those can be avoided.
“Lawyers must be vigilant in distinguishing between professional legal communications and nonlegal, casual conversations. The intent behind each interaction should be clear,” they wrote. “Only those directly related to seeking legal advice are protected under the attorney-client privilege.”
John and Sonette detailed how to protect clients in internal investigations with Upjohn warnings, “Incorporating an Upjohn warning (named after the Supreme Court’s seminal 1981 decision) into the standard interview outline should be a standard practice for corporate counsel. An Upjohn warning advises the corporate employee that the lawyer is the company’s lawyer, explains that the company (not the employee) controls the privilege, and warns the employee to maintain and protect the confidentiality of the discussion.”
Click here to read the full article (subscription required).
NOTICE.
Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that
doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited
information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information
about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from
us that we represent you (an ‘engagement letter’).
By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and, further, even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you. Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.