Thompson Coburn partner Ben Volk was quoted in an IAM article on the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO’s) latest AI subject matter eligibility guidance and how the patent office handles applications for AI technologies.
“Over the past couple of years, it has been like a case-by-case, examiner-by-examiner variation on the conclusions they draw for patent eligibility of AI-related inventions. You will have almost identical claims on very similar inventions in front of different examiners and some examiners will say, ‘this is eligible’, and other examiners will say, ‘this is not eligible’,” Ben said. “Now that there is a more detailed set of guidance and examples, I think we should start seeing more uniformity.”
He added that one particularly useful part of the 31-page guidance document covers determining eligibility for AI innovations dealing with the judicial exception on mathematical concepts.
Click here to read the full IAM article (subscription required).
In another interview published by Law360, Ben noted the USPTO guidance helpfully included scenarios where the office explained that certain types of AI-related inventions either would or would not be eligible for patents, but "when you start getting into the middle of the spectrum, it gets a little grayer.” He continued, "We're going to need the courts to produce more examples to really get clarity, but this is certainly more clarity than we had before.”
Click here to read the full Law360 article.
NOTICE.
Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that
doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited
information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information
about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from
us that we represent you (an ‘engagement letter’).
By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and, further, even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you. Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.