On a recent episode of the St. Louis Public Radio program “St. Louis on the Air,” Thompson Coburn partner and retired Judge Booker Shaw highlighted two prominent cases that have raised questions about Missouri's criminal justice system. These developments come in the wake of 2021 legislative changes related to wrongful conviction claims.
While Chris Dunn was exonerated from his murder conviction due to recanted testimony, Marcellus Williams remains on death row despite his claims of innocence under similar legal provisions.
In Dunn’s case, the key evidence involved witness testimony. Williams’ claim of innocence relied on DNA testing of the murder weapon, but prosecutors revealed in court this month that the knife and DNA evidence had been mishandled.
“This is a new area of the law for judges to have to grapple with,” said Booker, who together with TC associates Layla Husen and Rachael Moore assisted with the St. Louis circuit attorney’s review and presentation of the successful Chris Dunn motion to vacate conviction.
“In the Chris Dunn case, it was the rare case where the only evidence was the recanted testimony of two kids who were 12 and 14 years old at the time,” he said. “Under those circumstances, it fit the Supreme Court precedent. I think it was an easier call. Where there is other evidence, then proof of actual innocence is going to be more difficult.”
The Legal Roundtable panel also included Bill Freivogel, an attorney and a professor of journalism at Southern Illinois University Carbondale, and Sarah Swatosh, a labor and employment attorney in private practice.
Click here to listen to the full roundtable interview.
NOTICE.
Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that
doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited
information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information
about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from
us that we represent you (an ‘engagement letter’).
By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and, further, even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you. Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.