PepsiCo
Standard Insurance Company
Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
Xerox
We have represented corporations of all sizes and insurers in all kinds of ERISA benefit litigation across the United States. We defend against claims for pension, life, health, disability and severance benefits and against claims asserting breach of fiduciary duty. The unique features of ERISA litigation allow us to effectively and efficiently represent clients in courts throughout the United States. Most ERISA benefit cases are decided on summary judgment without discovery or oral argument, which means that our attorneys can represent the plan, the administrator or the fiduciary as effectively from the firm’s St. Louis office as from any other city, usually at substantially lower rates. In addition, unless an attorney focuses his or her practice on ERISA as our attorneys do, the client may not receive the full benefit of ERISA’s unique defenses.
We have been at the forefront of ERISA litigation related to cash balance plans, early retirement programs, ESOPS, stock drops and the reduction of retiree medical benefits. We have represented a party in more than 30 federal appellate reported decisions and more than 80 reported decisions from district courts across the country. Our clients vouch for our effective and efficient representation, and they consider us an important part of their employee benefit team.
We serve as national ERISA litigation counsel for Xerox Corporation and for PepsiCo, Inc., and recently have represented a multinational pharmaceutical and consumer packaged goods manufacturer in ERISA litigation pending in California, New Mexico and Illinois. Our attorneys have won cases before the First, Second, Fifth, Seventh, Eighth, Ninth, Tenth and Eleventh Circuits. We have successfully enforced forum selection clauses in ERISA plans and obtained summary judgments on the grounds the participant failed to exhaust his or her administrative remedies. And, of course, we have won cases involving straightforward ERISA § 502(a) claims for various benefits.
Cocker v. Terminal R.R. Ass'n of St. Louis Pension Plan For Nonschedule Employees: The district court held that the plan administrator’s interpretation of an offset provision in a pension plan was arbitrary and capricious. We persuaded the Seventh Circuit to reverse that judgment.
Kutten v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada (US): The district court held that the insurer had arbitrarily and capriciously interpreted a pre-existing medical condition exclusion. We persuaded the Eighth Circuit to reverse that judgment.
Pendleton v. QuikTrip Corporation: We won summary judgment on an ERISA § 510 claim by a long-term employee who claimed his employer had terminated his employment to avoid the obligation to pay him severance and stock option benefits. The Eighth Circuit affirmed.
Keach v. U.S. Trust Co. N.A.: After a three-week trial, the Court entered judgment in favor of all defendants and against the plaintiff, who alleged that the defendants had breached various fiduciary duties as a part of the ESOP purchasing 100% of the company. The Seventh Circuit affirmed.
California Employers, Are You Ready for 2024? 10 Things to Watch
Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Expands Title VII Coverage in a Reversal of Longstanding Precedent
Choice of law provisions in ERISA plans will not result in uniformity
A checklist for drafting Section 457(f) plans for tax-exempt employers
Ten things employers should know about individual coverage HRAs
Seven things employers should know about EBSA investigations
A top hat plan checklist for employers
Bifurcated trials: A road map for better results for insurers facing non-ERISA disability claims
5 takeaways from the employee ERISA win in McMillan
Is it time to address benefits for alternative work arrangements?
An ERISA claim check: 9 tips for effective and compliant claims procedures
Someone to watch over me and my 401(k)
Supreme Court clarifies definition of ‘church plan’ under ERISA
DOL revises guidance regarding exercise of shareholder rights by ERISA fiduciaries
Halo looms over new decision that adds to ERISA risks for claims administrators
Are HR employees ‘investment advisors’ under the DOL’s fiduciary rule?
Get the basics on two federal bills affecting employee benefits
The battle over 4062(e) 'facility closure' liability
Supreme Court upholds ERISA plan’s statute of limitations
Breaking Developments in Employee Benefits Plans
Labor, Employment and Employee Benefits Supreme Court Review
Industry Coverage: Michael Graham Joins Thompson Coburn
Thompson Coburn Welcomes Employee Benefits Litigator Michael Graham as Partner in Chicago
National law firm Thompson Coburn lands four partners in new Dallas office
Congratulations to our 14 ‘Lawyers of the Year’ for 2020
Thompson Coburn earns 11 national top-tier rankings in U.S. News 2019 ‘Best Law Firms’ survey
Congratulations to our 14 'Lawyers of the Year' for 2018
Thompson Coburn earns 11 national top-tier rankings in U.S. News ‘Best Law Firms’ survey
25 Thompson Coburn attorneys recognized in 2015 Chambers USA
Congratulations to our 15 St. Louis ‘Lawyers of the Year’
Cliff Godiner, Chuck Poplstein named to 2014 ‘Most Powerful Employment Attorneys’ list
Rick Pautler elected to American College of Employee Benefit Counsel
19 Thompson Coburn partners named 2013 St. Louis Lawyers of the Year
Chuck Poplstein elected to College of Labor and Employment Lawyers
Partner
|
Chicago
|
Mike represents management clients in a wide variety of labor and employment matters and related litigation. Mike represents management clients in a wide variety of labor and employmen... |
|
|||||
Partner
|
Dallas
|
Jenny is an experienced and strategic trial lawyer focusing her practice on health care, social justice, white-collar fraud and complex commercial litigation. Jenny is an experienced and strategic trial lawyer focusing her practice on... |
|
|||||
Partner
|
St. Louis
|
Jeff helps all types of businesses navigate complex litigation, arbitration, class action, regulatory, and transactional matters in venues across the country. Jeff helps all types of businesses navigate complex litigation, arbitration... |
|
|||||
Partner
|
Chicago
|
Throughout Michael Graham's career, his focus has been dedicated to handling employment, fiduciary, regulatory, employee benefits and ERISA litigation matters. Throughout Michael Graham's career, his focus has been dedicated to handlin... |
|
|||||
Senior Counsel
|
St. Louis
|
Rick devotes his entire practice to the defense of employers in ERISA litigation related to pension, life, health, and disability benefits, both self-funded and insured. Rick devotes his entire practice to the defense of employers in ERISA litig... |
|
|||||
Partner
|
St. Louis
|
Chuck is a creative and highly efficient employment litigator and advisor to private and public sector employers across a wide spectrum of industries. Chuck is a creative and highly efficient employment litigator and advisor t... |
|
|||||
Partner
|
Los Angeles |
New York |
John serves as a one-stop resource for employment counseling and litigation for companies in California and across the country. John serves as a one-stop resource for employment counseling and litigation... |
|
|||||
Senior Counsel
|
St. Louis
|
In an era of escalating pension liabilities and sweeping health care reforms, Trish serves as an employee benefits advisor to public and privately-owned businesses and go... In an era of escalating pension liabilities and sweeping health care reform... |
|
NOTICE.
Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that
doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited
information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information
about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from
us that we represent you (an ‘engagement letter’).
By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and, further, even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you. Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.